NYTimes: Advice by Panel Is to Reprimand, Not Oust, Rangel

I'm a Democrat. Let us get that out of the way. I can see me losing Twitter and FB friends now.

That said, does this surprise anyone? The Senate and House are one huge mutual adoration society where they act out an adversarial soap opera complete with preselected lines and sound bites. Everyone of them is just glad it's Rangel and not one of them. They become complicit by membership in the fraternity.

And don't be fooled. It happens in your workplace. Our paycheck is powerful hush money.

Are you being true to your convictions, to what is right?

Sometimes cynical,

Karl

From The New York Times:

Advice by Panel Is to Reprimand, Not Oust, Rangel

The congressman who led an inquiry into Representative Charles B. Rangel’s ethics said he and others recommended the relatively moderate punishment.

http://nyti.ms/9c2bGL

The Welcoming Darkness #triathlon

Img_0002

This is what it looks like down my street as I start my morning run.
What does it look like when and where you train? Share your photos.

Prechter’s Market Forecast Says ‘Take Cover. Worst Economic Decline in 300 Years

Mr. Prechter is convinced that we have entered a market decline of staggering proportions — perhaps the biggest of the last 300 years.

In a series of phone conversations and e-mail exchanges last week, he said that no other forecaster was likely to accept his reasoning, which is based on his version of the Elliott Wave theory — a technical approach to market analysis that he embraces with evangelical fervor.

Originating in the writings of Ralph Nelson Elliott, an obscure accountant who found repetitive patterns, or “fractals,” in the stock market of the 1930s and ’40s, the theory suggests that an epic downswing is under way, Mr. Prechter said. But he argued that even skeptical investors should take his advice seriously.

“I’m saying: ‘Winter is coming. Buy a coat,’ ” he said. “Other people are advising people to stay naked. If I’m wrong, you’re not hurt. If they’re wrong, you’re dead. It’s pretty benign advice to opt for safety for a while.”

His advice: individual investors should move completely out of the market and hold cash and cash equivalents, like Treasury bills, for years to come. (For traders with a fair amount of skill and willingness to embrace risk, he suggests other alternatives, like shorting the market or making bets on volatility.) But ultimately, “the decline will lead to one of the best investment opportunities ever,” he said.

Buy-and-hold stock investors will be devastated in a crash much worse than the declines of 2008 and early 2009 or the worst years of the Great Depression or the Panic of 1873, he predicted.

For a rough parallel, he said, go all the way back to England and the collapse of the South Sea Bubble in 1720, a crash that deterred people “from buying stocks for 100 years,” he said. This time, he said, “If I’m right, it will be such a shock that people will be telling their grandkids many years from now, ‘Don’t touch stocks.’ ”

The Dow, which now stands at 9,686.48, is likely to fall well below 1,000 over perhaps five or six years as a grand market cycle comes to an end, he said. That unraveling, combined with a depression and deflation, will make anyone holding cash “extremely grateful for their prudence.”

Mr. Prechter is hardly the only market hand to advocate prudence now, but nearly everyone else foresees a much rosier future, once current difficulties are past.

For example, Ralph J. Acampora, a market analyst with more than 40 years of experience, said he moved entirely out of stocks and into cash late last month. Now a partner at Alverita, a wealth management firm in New York, he said recent setbacks suggested that the market would drop another 10 or 15 percent, probably until September or October, before resuming another “meaningful rally.”

Over the next several years Mr. Acampora expects an “old normal market,” characterized by relatively short-lived swings that will provide many opportunities for smart investors — one that resembles the markets of the 1960s and 70s. “I’ve lived through it,” he said.

Like Mr. Prechter, he is a past president of the Market Technicians Association, the leading organization of technical market analysts, and he said that his colleague has done “some very good work.” But Mr. Acampora doesn’t agree with Mr. Prechter’s long-term theories, either intellectually or emotionally.

The “mathematics don’t work,” Mr. Acampora said, because such a big decline would imply that individual stocks would need to trade at unrealistically low levels. Furthermore, he said, “I don’t want to agree with him, because if he’s right, we’ve basically got to go to the mountains with a gun and some soup cans, because it’s all over.”

Still, on a “near-term” basis, he said, “We’re probably saying the same thing.”

Similarly, Larry Berman, who co-founded ETF Capital Management in Toronto and recently ended his term as the president of the technicians association, says he sees a “classic” short-term negative market trend developing now. But he doesn’t use the Elliott Wave theory, saying Mr. Prechter is trying to “measure the market in decades, which is too long a time frame for practical trading purposes or for risk management.”

Mr. Prechter, 61, lives in Gainesville, Ga., where he runs Elliott Wave International, a forecasting and publishing firm. He graduated from Yale as a psychology major in 1971, dabbled as a singer, drummer and songwriter in a rock band and became a technical analyst for Merrill Lynch.

He became fascinated by Mr. Elliott’s writings, which suggest that the market moves in predictable if complex patterns. Along with A. J. Frost, Mr. Prechter wrote “Elliott Wave Principle,” a 1978 book that predicted the emergence of a great bull market — a forecast that was largely fulfilled. By 1987, he was widely regarded as an expert in technical analysis. Articles in The New York Times said he was known as “the market’s leading technical guru” — and more. An article in October that year said he had “emerged as both prophet and deity, an adviser whose advice reaches so many investors that he tends to pull the market the way he has predicted it will move.”

He has far less day-to-day influence now, after years spent developing a theory he calls “socionomics,” which holds “social moods” as the cause not only of market cycles but also of economic and political events. A grand cycle is ending, he says, and the time for reckoning is near.

How do we know what to believe?

Garcia-Tolson nominated for an Espy Award. Please Vote!

I voted for Rudy and hope you will, too. Rudy is not only a triathlete but also an Olympic swimmer. He beat me out of the water at Ironman Arizona by several (LOTS) minutes. It wasn't until well into the 112 mile bike course that I met him again. It was an honor to be there to see him realize this incredible achievement. http://ironman.com/profiles/vote-for-rudy-garcia-tolson-ironmans-first-double-amputee-finisher-before-july-10?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ironman%2Ftopstories+%28Ironman.com+Top+Stories%29

How Many People Do You Influence? You Won't Believe How Many!

This is so cool and fun! 
You influence more people than you can imagine. This will surprise you. http://fcinf.com/v/cgcx/welcome 

Yes, My Blog Sucks...But I Do Want To Do Better

I was reading the blog post Is Your Blog the Unpopular Kid? by Andrea Bartz and Brenna Ehrlich and picturing my poor little blog in every paragraph. Granted, I didn't go into this expecting to become a full-time blogger or a blogosphere rock star, but I have to admit at being disappointed when not one of my posts would get comments. People were opening my links but NO ONE was commenting...even to say my blog sucks. Was I doing such a masterful job of covering every point to my topics that I was leaving nothing for others to comment? Perhaps; OK, not likely. 

As I considered creating my own blog, my early research told me to find a topic and stick to it. "Generalizing is not for the blogosphere," I was told. You have to specialize. And yet, I decide to do a blog about what strikes me on the day. I suppose a well-known personality is interesting enough to ramble about his day, but I shouldn't be so cocky as to think that's I.

Andrea and Brenna, your advice hit home. I'll try to do better but the fact is there are so many areas that interest me. I can't see myself writing about one thing. Perhaps I just need to get more creative and find a way to write about a lot of things but somehow weave it back into my one specialized topic.

You know, that's it. I just haven't been creative enough. With time and experience, I'll get better. Of course, the fact my high school English teacher told me I write like an attorney should have given me a clue that my creativity is not my strong suit. (Or maybe she was hinting I should go to law school, which I also didn't do.)

Maybe I'll write arguments about other people's blog posts, since I guess that's what my teacher was hinting to. Actually, I never asked her what she meant when she said that and to this day, I have no idea. I should call her.

OK, I'm rambling again. Let me go think about what I'm best at and write more about that.

Author's note: I did get my first comment this past week, but it was for a blog post someone else wrote that I linked to my blog. How sad...

Have An Awesome Day

Check out this video on YouTube:

Think You're Operating on Free Will? Think Again

Think You're Operating on Free Will? Think Again http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2000994,00.html

Jesus Christ May Not Have Died on Cross, Scholar Says

No evidence in Ancient sources backs up defining symbol of Christianity http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/jesus-christ-died-cross-scholar/story?id=11066130